Who Should Sign Off Service Charge Accounts? A Practical Guide for Managing Agents
- carmenxerohero
- May 12
- 5 min read
Updated: 6 days ago
In the resident block management industry, few areas create more confusion than the approval and sign-off process for service charge accounts, engagement letters, and statutory accounts.
Who should sign them? Should it be the managing agent? The directors of the Residents’ Management Company (RMC)? The Right to Manage (RTM) company? Or the independent accountant?
These questions arise regularly across the UK leasehold property management sector, yet there is surprisingly little direct guidance that clearly prescribes one single approach.
In the latest episode of Qube Talk: Service Charge Accounting Insights, accountants Ray Armand and CJ discuss the practical, legal, and compliance considerations around account approvals and signatory authority within service charge accounting.
This article summarises the key insights from the episode and provides practical guidance for managing agents looking to strengthen their compliance procedures, reduce operational risk, and improve governance.
Why Sign-Off Procedures Matter in Service Charge Accounting
At first glance, approving service charge accounts may seem like an administrative task. In reality, it is a significant governance and compliance issue.
Poorly documented sign-off procedures can create:
Disputes with leaseholders
Tribunal complications
Audit trail failures
AML compliance concerns
Questions over authority and accountability
Increased operational risk for managing agents
For managing agents handling large portfolios across multiple developments, inconsistent approval processes can quickly become problematic.
One of the biggest themes discussed in the podcast is that while there may not always be one “correct” approach, there absolutely needs to be:
A documented policy
Consistency
Clear authority structures
Strong internal controls
Proper evidence of approval
What Does ICAEW Tech 03/11 Say?
A key reference point in service charge accounting is ICAEW Tech 03/11, which provides technical guidance for accountants preparing or reviewing service charge accounts.
However, Tech 03/11 does not explicitly prescribe:
Who must sign engagement letters
Who must approve service charge accounts
Whether the managing agent or RMC should engage the accountant
This creates flexibility within the industry — but also creates ambiguity.
As discussed in the episode, different managing agents and accountants adopt different approaches depending on:
The property structure
The lease wording
Operational preferences
AML considerations
Internal governance frameworks
The Two Most Common Industry Approaches
1. The Managing Agent Engages the Accountant
This is one of the most common approaches seen in practice.
Under this structure:
The managing agent appoints the independent accountant
The engagement letter is signed by the managing agent
The service charge accounts are approved by the managing agent
Directors may still review the accounts before approval
Why Many Firms Prefer This Approach
There are several practical advantages:
Operational Efficiency
Managing agents are typically:
Maintaining the accounting records
Managing the bookkeeping
Communicating with contractors
Liaising with the accountant throughout the year
This creates a more streamlined communication process.
AML (Anti-Money Laundering) Alignment
From an accountant’s perspective, AML obligations often focus more heavily on the managing agent because they:
Control the funds
Operate the client accounts
Administer the financial processes
As discussed in the podcast, many accountants increasingly see the managing agent as the primary AML risk point.
This means it can make operational and compliance sense for:
The accountant engagement
AML procedures
Account approvals to all align with the managing agent.
Faster Approval Processes
RMC and RTM directors are often volunteer directors who:
Have full-time jobs elsewhere
Are difficult to coordinate
May not respond quickly
May struggle with digital approval systems allowing the managing agent to handle approvals can reduce delays significantly.
2. The RMC or RTM Engages the Accountant
The second common approach is where:
The Residents’ Management Company (RMC)
Right to Manage (RTM) company
Freeholder directly appoints the accountant.
In this setup:
Directors sign the engagement letter
Directors approve the service charge accounts
The accountant engages directly with the company
This approach can create a very clear legal chain of authority
Advantages of This Structure
Strong director oversight
Clear corporate governance
Directors remain closely involved in financial reporting
Direct accountability to leaseholders
Challenges
However, this structure can also create:
Delays in obtaining approvals
Communication bottlenecks
Administrative inefficiencies
Difficulties coordinating multiple directors
Many managing agents therefore adopt hybrid processes where:
Directors review and approve accounts internally
The managing agent completes the formal sign-off process with the accountant

The Most Important Point: Consistency
One of the key messages from the podcast episode is this:
There is no single mandatory industry-wide approach — but your process must be consistent.
Managing agents should have:
A written sign-off policy
Clear approval authority levels
Defined internal controls
Documented approval evidence
Consistent procedures across sites
Without this, confusion can arise over:
Who approved the accounts
Whether authority existed
Whether the approval process was valid
In serious disputes or tribunal situations, poor documentation can become a major issue.
Who Within the Managing Agent Can Approve Accounts?
This is one of the biggest gaps often seen in practice.
Many firms decide:
“The managing agent signs off the accounts.”
But they fail to define:
Which individuals within the managing agent have authority
Whether property managers can approve
Whether service charge accountants can approve
Whether directors or senior managers must review first
This creates significant governance risk.
Managing agents should maintain:
An approved signatory list
Internal approval workflows
Evidence of director or senior management review
Digital audit trails where possible
Why Audit Trails Are Becoming Increasingly Important
In modern property management, approvals are often handled electronically via:
Accounting portals
Digital signature systems
Workflow software
This means verbal approvals are no longer sufficient.
Managing agents should aim to retain:
Email approvals
Digital signatures
Internal workflow records
Authorisation logs
Strong audit trails are becoming increasingly important for:
ICAEW compliance
AML procedures
Tribunal evidence
Internal governance
Client accountability
Statutory Accounts Are Different
One area where the rules are much clearer is statutory company accounts filed at Companies House.
If an RMC or RTM company exists, the statutory accounts:
Must be approved by a director of the company
Cannot be approved solely by the managing agent
This is a legal company law requirement.
In practice, many managing agents still assist with the process by:
Coordinating approvals
Communicating with directors
Gathering confirmation emails
Managing the administrative workflow
But legally, the director approval remains essential.
The Lease Always Comes First
Perhaps the most important legal point discussed in the episode is this:
The lease overrides everything.
Even if:
Industry practice suggests one approach
Your internal process suggests another
Your accountant prefers a certain structure
If the lease or transfer document explicitly states:
Who appoints the accountant
Who approves the accounts
Whether an audit is required
then that wording takes precedence.
This is why managing agents should always:
Read the lease carefully
Review transfer documents
Understand site-specific requirements
Avoid relying solely on standard practice
Why Lease Summaries Are Essential
One practical recommendation discussed in the podcast is the creation of lease summary documents.
Rather than repeatedly reviewing lengthy lease documents, managing agents should create concise summaries covering:
Service charge requirements
Audit requirements
Approval structures
Signatory authority
Reserve fund rules
Recoverable expenditure provisions
Key compliance clauses
This can:
Improve operational efficiency
Reduce mistakes
Help new staff understand sites quickly
Improve communication with accountants
Strengthen compliance procedures
Best Practice Recommendations for Managing Agents
Based on the discussion in the episode, managing agents should consider implementing the following:
Best Practice Checklist
✔ Create a formal sign-off policy✔ Maintain approved signatory lists✔ Define internal authority levels✔ Keep digital approval evidence✔ Ensure consistency across sites✔ Review lease requirements carefully✔ Create lease summary documents✔ Align processes with AML obligations✔ Document deviations from standard procedures✔ Ensure directors review accounts where appropriate
Final Thoughts
Service charge accounting is becoming increasingly regulated, scrutinised, and compliance-driven.
Managing agents who invest time into:
Strong governance
Clear approval procedures
Proper documentation
Defined authority structures
will place themselves in a far stronger position operationally and legally.
The sign-off process may seem like a small administrative detail — but in practice, it can have significant consequences if handled incorrectly.
Listen to the Full Podcast Episode
To hear the full discussion between Ray Armand and CJ on:
Service charge account approvals
Engagement letters
AML considerations
Director sign-offs
Statutory accounts
Lease requirements
Best practice procedures
.jpg)


Comments